Friday, January 31, 2014

State of the Union 2014 Impressions






At the beginning of every year, the President of the United States delivers a speech about the executive office’s agenda. On most occasions the President walks into Congress and delivers a televised prime time speech to the public with great anticipation. I watched the speech live with some other people at a pizza parlor as I did the previous year. I went home thinking that President Obama in his 2014 State of the Union speech outlined specific actions that should increase his popularity in a midterm election year, but I was unmoved when Obama did not mention details.
Obama made clear in his speech that his executive agenda would progress regardless of what Congress did to stop it. Last year the House of Representatives, the majority of them Republicans, voted many times to repeal the new health care law and even shut down the federal government for a while to try and force the President to accede to their demands. Therefore, the theme of Obama’s speech was exercising executive authority to implement agenda items and asking Congress to help him push what he believes the United States public wants from their government. The most important example was Obama asking Congress to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10, but even if Congress does nothing, the President will require the federal government to award contracts only to companies that pay their employees that amount or higher. Obama backed up his proposal with supporting evidence, that paying higher wages increases worker morale and allows more spending in the economy. I appreciated more the stand Obama made on negotiations about the Iranian nuclear program. The President promised that he would veto any attempt to sabotage the negotiations with Iran like through additional sanctions. I still worry that the United States will blame Iran for the negotiation failure even if the rest of the world thinks the United States caused more problems, but I don’t think Obama has much control over that.
When the President avoided specifics, I reacted with skepticism, but I also felt disgusted. To circumvent Congress, Obama is proposing a new Treasury bond that would help lower-income workers without business-supported retirement accounts to save more. Obama called it myRA, but I will need more info on it before I would recommend investing in it. My skepticism includes agenda items based on older proposals like removing gender discrimination in wage earning, reforming the immigration system, and closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The President briefly mentioned the issues of global trade agreements and government surveillance reform, and I know exactly why. The President is pushing fast-track legislation to make it so that deals like the Trans Pacific Partnership only get an up or down vote when they are finally delivered to Congress even though the trade deals negotiated in secret may have questionable provisions dealing with labor, environmental, and intellectual property standards. Furthermore, Obama has said that he would reform government surveillance, and by reform he means ignoring any abuse that might exist in the system, deferring to the intelligence agencies that their work is legal and ethical, and trying to shut up anyone who would be more transparent about what the government is actually doing. The worst part was the talk about dealing with Syria because of the act of omission that happens later. Obama said that the United States “will continue to work with the international community to usher in the future the Syrian people deserve -- a future free of dictatorship, terror and fear.” After discussing his domestic position on the Iranian nuclear negotiations, Obama added, “from Tunisia to Burma, we're supporting those who are willing to do the hard work of building democracy.” The President did not mention Egypt at all, probably because it embarrasses the United States to support a military coup of a democratically elected government following the overthrow of an autocratic regime. It may not be that simple, but the fact remains that the United States is not supporting building democracy in Egypt in the interest of regional stability, and Obama missed the opportunity to actually help the Egyptian people when they demanded Mubarak leave power.
In the 2014 State of the Union speech, President Obama outlined his agenda that could progress regardless of Congressional obstruction. When Obama was getting specific about his actions, I was pleased about his stances, but his overarching emotional appeals and vague policy proposals were unimpressive and in some cases disappointing. At least I got to meet a Congressional candidate running in my district because I stayed late at the watch party. Maybe I will have a story to tell about his upcoming Meet and Greet.




No comments:

Post a Comment